Harun Raaj & AssociatesHarun Raaj & Associates

Tax Notice · Income Tax · GST · TDS

Received a tax notice? Here is exactly what it means and what to do next.

Most tax notices are routine. A wrong response turns a routine notice into a demand. We handle both — the reading and the reply.

Share your noticeTDS rate finder →

The four issues

Where this area actually goes wrong.

Each of the four pillars below is statute-cited — the section, the form, and the consequence. No vague claims.

01

Intimation u/s 143(1) — the routine notice

Section 143(1) intimations are auto-generated by CPC for minor arithmetic mismatches between your ITR and TDS data. They carry no stigma — over 90% of salaried taxpayers receive at least one. You have 30 days to respond by accepting the adjustment, disagreeing, or filing a revised return. Ignoring a 143(1) intimation converts it into a demand under s.156.

30-day response window · CPC auto-generated · no field officer involvement

02

Scrutiny u/s 143(2) and 143(3)

A 143(2) notice selects your return for detailed examination by an Assessing Officer. This is where representation matters. The AO can examine books, call for documents, and make additions. A 143(3) assessment order is the outcome. Additions made here attract interest u/s 234B and potentially penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment.

AO-driven · document production required · CA representation essential

03

Reopening u/s 148 — the reassessment notice

Section 148 allows the AO to reopen a completed assessment if there is "reason to believe" income escaped assessment. Post-Finance Act 2021, the time limit is 3 years (or 10 years if escaped income exceeds ₹50L). The AO must issue a Show Cause Notice (SCN) u/s 148A before serving the 148 notice itself — you can object at the 148A stage. Missing this window is irreversible.

3-year limit (10yr for >₹50L) · 148A SCN before main notice · respond at 148A stage

04

GST SCN and DRC-01

GST notices — whether a Scrutiny Notice u/r 99, a Show Cause Notice under DRC-01 for demand, or a DRC-01A for pre-notice consultation — all have tight statutory timelines. A DRC-01 carries a 30-day payment window under s.73(8)/s.74(8) CGST, and the reply in DRC-06 must go in within the period stated in the notice. GSTR discrepancies detected by ASMT-10 are commonly given 15 days to reply in ASMT-11. Missing these windows creates ex-parte orders that are much harder to appeal.

DRC-01 30-day window · ASMT-10 15-day reply period · ex-parte order risk

The honest angle

5 mistakes that turn a notice into a demand

The notice itself rarely creates the damage. What creates it is how the recipient responds — or does not respond — to it.

Not responding at all

Silence is not a neutral act; it creates a best-judgment assessment.

Responding without reading the notice type

A 143(1) response and a 143(3) response are completely different documents.

Volunteering information not asked for

AOs are required to examine what they ask; your job is to answer, not explain.

Missing the response deadline

All notice timelines are jurisdictional; courts rarely grant extensions.

Our engagement

Five tracks for responding to a tax notice.

01

Notice triage and reading

Identify notice type, assess risk, advise on whether CA representation is needed.

24–48 hours

02

143(1) intimation response

Agree/disagree letter or revised ITR filing.

Per notice

03

Scrutiny 143(3) representation

Full AO representation — document compilation, hearing attendance, assessment.

Ongoing

04

Section 148 reassessment

148A objection + substantive response to reopened assessment.

Per case

05

GST SCN / DRC-01 reply

Detailed reply with GSTR reconciliation and documentary support.

Per notice

FAQs

Five questions people ask us after the notice arrives.

I got a 143(1) intimation saying I owe ₹18,000. Is this a real tax demand?

Yes, a 143(1) intimation becomes a demand notice under section 156 if you do not respond within 30 days. The most common cause: your Form 26AS shows less TDS than you claimed in the ITR, or the CPC applied a different deduction amount. Log in to the Income Tax e-Filing portal, view the computation, and decide: if the adjustment is correct, pay the demand; if incorrect, file a rectification request u/s 154 or a revised ITR. The ₹18,000 does not compound automatically — it becomes due only after the 30-day response window closes without action.

My ITR is under scrutiny u/s 143(2). What documents will the AO ask for?

Typically: bank statements for all accounts for the relevant AY, salary slips or Form 16, investment proofs (80C, 80D, HRA landlord PAN etc.), property purchase/sale documents if capital gains are involved, and — if you have business income — books of accounts. The AO's notice will specify. Under CBDT's Faceless Assessment Scheme (launched 2020), most scrutiny proceedings are conducted online via the portal. You submit documents as PDFs with an index. The AO cannot call you to the office in a faceless assessment.

I received a notice u/s 148 for AY 2019-20. Is this within the time limit?

It depends on which window governs AY 2019-20. Because that assessment year began before 1 April 2021, the pre-Finance Act 2021 limits continue to apply: under s.149(1)(b) as it then stood, the AO had up to 6 years from the end of the relevant assessment year — i.e. until 31 March 2026 — to issue a 148 notice where the income escaping assessment was ₹1 lakh or more. The new 3-year limit (extended to 10 years only where escaped income exceeds ₹50 lakh AND the AO holds information from a specified authority) applies to assessment years beginning on or after 1 April 2021. A 148 notice for AY 2019-20 served after 31 March 2026 without a higher escape basis is time-barred and can be challenged. Your first step: check the date of service and review the AO's "reason to believe" at the s.148A stage.

The notice says "concealment of income u/s 271(1)(c)". Is that a criminal charge?

No — s.271(1)(c) is a civil penalty, not a criminal prosecution. The penalty ranges from 100% to 300% of the tax evaded. It is levied after the assessment is completed and an addition is confirmed. The key defence: if you have a "bona fide" explanation for the discrepancy (an honest mistake, an interpretation question, a computational error), courts have consistently held that penalty is not automatic. The AO must prove concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars — the burden of proof shifts. A good CA response at the 143(3) stage often prevents the 271(1)(c) notice from ever being issued.

We received a GST DRC-01 for ₹8.4L. What is the actual deadline to reply?

Under s.73(8) read with Rule 142 of the CGST Rules, if you pay the tax with interest within 30 days of the date of service of the DRC-01 — via Form GST DRC-03 — the proceedings close without penalty. If you contest the demand instead, you file a reply in Form GST DRC-06 within the period stated in the notice, with your GSTR-2A/2B-vs-books reconciliation attached. Under s.74(8), payment within 30 days of the notice still attracts a reduced 25% penalty. Missing these windows allows the proper officer to pass an ex-parte order confirming the demand — after which you would need to appeal to the Appellate Authority, a longer and more expensive process. A practical note: always reply formally within the stated period, even if only to say the detailed response is being prepared.

Get your diagnosis

Share your notice — we respond with a diagnosis in 24 hours.

Send us the notice PDF and your last filed ITR. We reply with the notice type, the deadline that matters, and the response plan — before you draft a single word.

Share your notice
Contact the team →TDS rate finder →NRI tax services →